I’ve taken advantage of a few days’ leave to tackle one of those tasks I’ve never really found the energy to get round to: cataloguing, winnowing, and keywording my photos. Here are ten of those I was pleased (for one reason or another) to reacquaint myself with.
A few days ago, Pete Enns posted A Brief but Deep Thought on Defending the Christian Faith (or not). His basic thesis was that “the intellect is not “the primary arena for engaging the truth of Christianity.” Rather, a well-lived and embodied faith is Christian truth’s best commendation. Therefore, apologetics needs to take a back seat to the testimony of lived experience.
I’m not sure how deep that thought actually is. It may be a bigger idea in American evangelicalism than elsewhere, and I have nothing against what he is affirming (though he places an undue burden of guilt on many of us for our inadequate embodiments of truth). The individual lives of the saints (big and small ‘s’) have often been more persuasive than the life of the institution and most of its members.
(In addition to his argument, I would note, despite ecclesial imperfections, the best corporate worship of the church has also often been its own self-commending vision of the beauty of truth as well as holiness, and this corporate dimension of Christian life is rather absent from his account.)
Nonetheless, I think good apologetics needs upgrading, and not downgrading, and Christians need to be better at articulating their faith in ways which commend not only the reasonableness of the faith, but the rationality of God and God’s universe.
I have (I think in common with Enns) little time for the kind of apologetics which produces pre-digested arguments, selected quotations, and packaged answers to caricatured questions whose main purpose is to make Christians feel superior.
Whenever I hear someone reproduce C. S. Lewis’s trilemma, I groan. There is a fair point behind it: there is something strange in claiming Jesus to be a great moral teacher while rejecting pretty much everything he said about God. However, since I agree with the overwhelming consensus of scholarly opinion that Jesus didn’t wander around saying things like “I am the Way, the Truth and the Life”, the whole “Mad, Bad, or God” case dissolves itself in the acid bath of historical criticism.
This isn’t the apologetic I’m looking for.
One of the problems which gets in the way of a fair account of apologetic is the collapse of confidence in public reason. Post-modernity has largely rejected not only the totalising accounts of the Enlightenment era, but a much older sense of the rationality of creation and revelation: the kind of thing that is typified in St Thomas, or the whole “faith seeking understanding” tradition which goes back at least to St Augustine.
It’s in this context I’m still looking for an apologetic which not only draws out and commends the inner rationality of the faith, but also shows how that faith might enlighten the practice of other intellectual disciplines, and illuminate the truth of the only universe we have to share.
Revitalizing apologetic might have, I suggest, at least three goods for the contemporary church. It will train Christians to explore their faith as reasonable, and so equip them to love God with their minds as they embrace other intellectual disciplines. It will enable Christians to engage the views of others critically and constructively, on the basis of our common created rationality, with the confidence of a 2,000-year-old tradition of thinking. Finally, it will enable the church to take a stand in and against a post-truth society.
The rational and relational given-ness of the world is not simply a matter of convenience to be adopted or discarded – neither in the contingencies of anyone’s present preference, nor purely as the idiosyncrasy of a personal faith-perspective. Apologetic is a way of living out that commitment to understanding the world as the work of God’s reason, God’s logos.
It’s always interesting to read a book which works hard to overturn a consensus. I’ve just finished a scholarly monograph which attempts to do just that: The Pauline Church and the Corinthian Ekklēsia by Richard Last.
Last’s aim is to set the Corinthian church in the context of Greco-Roman associations. He thinks previous scholarship has overestimated both the size and the distinctiveness of the Corinthian church. As he makes his case he pays particular attention to questions of membership dues, elections of officers, and honorific awards. Continue reading “Clubbing together in Corinth (a review)”
I was intrigued by the lectionary options when planning ahead for the licensing and admission of new LLMs (Readers). This will take place on 16 September, which is also the feast of St Ninian (technically a lesser festival). According to the Church of England’s provision, the recommended gospel for the Eucharist is Mark 16:15-end. Continue reading “Bible or not Bible: a canon with fuzzy edges”
I make no great claims for my ability with video, but since yesterday I was filling in, in the absence of professional colleagues, I thought I’d use the opportunity of a very enjoyable afternoon to start learning some new skills.
The event was Holland House’s Interfaith Picnic (co-organised with Worcestershire Interfaith Forum) which included a fantastic vegan buffet meaning everyone could share the same food. The skills I was trying out for the first time were editing in Final Cut Pro X, and recording sound (for the interviews) separately on a Zoom (with a cheap lapel mike) and synchronising it in post.
This is what I made of it:
I voted Labour in the General Election at the start of this month. And I’m getting annoyed by the people who claim they know what that vote meant. Continue reading “Not in my name: explaining my vote in #GE2017”
Here’s hoping one or two of you blog readers, Twitter followers or Facebook friends might help out with this.
I’m coming up to that new computer purchase time again, and I’m facing that Mac or Windows question once more. Purchase price aside (for the sake of argument), what is the best choice for someone considering whether to start a fairly big academic writing project? Continue reading “Geeky academic tech advice needed”
Sometimes you can find interesting patterns with a double exposure. And my Fuji does make it very easy to experiment.
The reading of the whole story of Jesus’ last night and day of his ministry, the last supper, trial, crucifixion and burial, is an important part of Christian liturgy on this Sunday of the Lord’s Passion (Palm Sunday). It poses a particular problem when, as this year, it is the turn of Matthew’s gospel.
High up on the list of verses that we might wish had never made it into the Bible is this part of the story: Continue reading ““His blood be upon us””